summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: 29f3339)
raw | patch | inline | side by side (parent: 29f3339)
author | NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> | |
Sat, 31 Oct 2015 00:00:56 +0000 (11:00 +1100) | ||
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | |
Mon, 9 Nov 2015 20:50:26 +0000 (12:50 -0800) |
commit d01552a76d71f9879af448e9142389ee9be6e95b upstream.
This reverts commit 7eb418851f3278de67126ea0c427641ab4792c57.
This commit is poorly justified, I can find not discusison in email,
and it clearly causes a problem.
If a device which is being recovered fails and is subsequently
re-added to an array, there could easily have been changes to the
array *before* the point where the recovery was up to. So the
recovery must start again from the beginning.
If a spare is being recovered and fails, then when it is re-added we
really should do a bitmap-based recovery up to the recovery-offset,
and then a full recovery from there. Before this reversion, we only
did the "full recovery from there" which is not corect. After this
reversion with will do a full recovery from the start, which is safer
but not ideal.
It will be left to a future patch to arrange the two different styles
of recovery.
Reported-and-tested-by: Nate Dailey <nate.dailey@stratus.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Fixes: 7eb418851f32 ("md: allow a partially recovered device to be hot-added to an array.")
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This reverts commit 7eb418851f3278de67126ea0c427641ab4792c57.
This commit is poorly justified, I can find not discusison in email,
and it clearly causes a problem.
If a device which is being recovered fails and is subsequently
re-added to an array, there could easily have been changes to the
array *before* the point where the recovery was up to. So the
recovery must start again from the beginning.
If a spare is being recovered and fails, then when it is re-added we
really should do a bitmap-based recovery up to the recovery-offset,
and then a full recovery from there. Before this reversion, we only
did the "full recovery from there" which is not corect. After this
reversion with will do a full recovery from the start, which is safer
but not ideal.
It will be left to a future patch to arrange the two different styles
of recovery.
Reported-and-tested-by: Nate Dailey <nate.dailey@stratus.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Fixes: 7eb418851f32 ("md: allow a partially recovered device to be hot-added to an array.")
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
drivers/md/md.c | patch | blob | history |
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 31d14d88205b4f7c5f816fdb7d41bf56c9507547..af837313d431c92a15c550633368ae5199ebf60b 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
!test_bit(Bitmap_sync, &rdev->flags)))
continue;
- if (rdev->saved_raid_disk < 0)
- rdev->recovery_offset = 0;
+ rdev->recovery_offset = 0;
if (mddev->pers->
hot_add_disk(mddev, rdev) == 0) {
if (sysfs_link_rdev(mddev, rdev))