]> Gitweb @ Texas Instruments - Open Source Git Repositories - git.TI.com/gitweb - android-sdk/kernel-video.git/commitdiff
tty: don't deadlock while flushing workqueue
authorSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Tue, 25 Dec 2012 22:02:48 +0000 (23:02 +0100)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 04:48:30 +0000 (21:48 -0700)
commit 852e4a8152b427c3f318bb0e1b5e938d64dcdc32 upstream.

Since commit 89c8d91e31f2 ("tty: localise the lock") I see a dead lock
in one of my dummy_hcd + g_nokia test cases. The first run was usually
okay, the second often resulted in a splat by lockdep and the third was
usually a dead lock.
Lockdep complained about tty->hangup_work and tty->legacy_mutex taken
both ways:
| ======================================================
| [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
| 3.7.0-rc6+ #204 Not tainted
| -------------------------------------------------------
| kworker/2:1/35 is trying to acquire lock:
|  (&tty->legacy_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c14051e6>] tty_lock_nested+0x36/0x80
|
| but task is already holding lock:
|  ((&tty->hangup_work)){+.+...}, at: [<c104f6e4>] process_one_work+0x124/0x5e0
|
| which lock already depends on the new lock.
|
| the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
|
| -> #2 ((&tty->hangup_work)){+.+...}:
|        [<c107fe74>] lock_acquire+0x84/0x190
|        [<c104d82d>] flush_work+0x3d/0x240
|        [<c12e6986>] tty_ldisc_flush_works+0x16/0x30
|        [<c12e7861>] tty_ldisc_release+0x21/0x70
|        [<c12e0dfc>] tty_release+0x35c/0x470
|        [<c1105e28>] __fput+0xd8/0x270
|        [<c1105fcd>] ____fput+0xd/0x10
|        [<c1051dd9>] task_work_run+0xb9/0xf0
|        [<c1002a51>] do_notify_resume+0x51/0x80
|        [<c140550a>] work_notifysig+0x35/0x3b
|
| -> #1 (&tty->legacy_mutex/1){+.+...}:
|        [<c107fe74>] lock_acquire+0x84/0x190
|        [<c140276c>] mutex_lock_nested+0x6c/0x2f0
|        [<c14051e6>] tty_lock_nested+0x36/0x80
|        [<c1405279>] tty_lock_pair+0x29/0x70
|        [<c12e0bb8>] tty_release+0x118/0x470
|        [<c1105e28>] __fput+0xd8/0x270
|        [<c1105fcd>] ____fput+0xd/0x10
|        [<c1051dd9>] task_work_run+0xb9/0xf0
|        [<c1002a51>] do_notify_resume+0x51/0x80
|        [<c140550a>] work_notifysig+0x35/0x3b
|
| -> #0 (&tty->legacy_mutex){+.+.+.}:
|        [<c107f3c9>] __lock_acquire+0x1189/0x16a0
|        [<c107fe74>] lock_acquire+0x84/0x190
|        [<c140276c>] mutex_lock_nested+0x6c/0x2f0
|        [<c14051e6>] tty_lock_nested+0x36/0x80
|        [<c140523f>] tty_lock+0xf/0x20
|        [<c12df8e4>] __tty_hangup+0x54/0x410
|        [<c12dfcb2>] do_tty_hangup+0x12/0x20
|        [<c104f763>] process_one_work+0x1a3/0x5e0
|        [<c104fec9>] worker_thread+0x119/0x3a0
|        [<c1055084>] kthread+0x94/0xa0
|        [<c140ca37>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28
|
|other info that might help us debug this:
|
|Chain exists of:
|  &tty->legacy_mutex --> &tty->legacy_mutex/1 --> (&tty->hangup_work)
|
| Possible unsafe locking scenario:
|
|       CPU0                    CPU1
|       ----                    ----
|  lock((&tty->hangup_work));
|                               lock(&tty->legacy_mutex/1);
|                               lock((&tty->hangup_work));
|  lock(&tty->legacy_mutex);
|
| *** DEADLOCK ***

Before the path mentioned tty_ldisc_release() look like this:

| tty_ldisc_halt(tty);
| tty_ldisc_flush_works(tty);
| tty_lock();

As it can be seen, it first flushes the workqueue and then grabs the
tty_lock. Now we grab the lock first:

| tty_lock_pair(tty, o_tty);
| tty_ldisc_halt(tty);
| tty_ldisc_flush_works(tty);

so lockdep's complaint seems valid.

The earlier version of this patch took the ldisc_mutex since the other
user of tty_ldisc_flush_works() (tty_set_ldisc()) did this.
Peter Hurley then said that it is should not be requried. Since it
wasn't done earlier, I dropped this part.
The code under tty_ldisc_kill() was executed earlier with the tty lock
taken so it is taken again.

I was able to reproduce the deadlock on v3.8-rc1, this patch fixes the
problem in my testcase. I didn't notice any problems so far.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue.lkml@nexus-software.ie>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c

index c5782294e53261e701f13292b5732c231cfb9d14..78f1be2e674b7d4d04d11e2749b95df4532c9010 100644 (file)
@@ -934,17 +934,17 @@ void tty_ldisc_release(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_struct *o_tty)
         * race with the set_ldisc code path.
         */
 
-       tty_lock_pair(tty, o_tty);
        tty_ldisc_halt(tty);
-       tty_ldisc_flush_works(tty);
-       if (o_tty) {
+       if (o_tty)
                tty_ldisc_halt(o_tty);
+
+       tty_ldisc_flush_works(tty);
+       if (o_tty)
                tty_ldisc_flush_works(o_tty);
-       }
 
+       tty_lock_pair(tty, o_tty);
        /* This will need doing differently if we need to lock */
        tty_ldisc_kill(tty);
-
        if (o_tty)
                tty_ldisc_kill(o_tty);